|
CryBabies 7:52 Thu May 30
Nasri
|
|
Quite surprised we are getting rid of him, he's looked decent when playing, but I suppose he is a little to injury prone. I do wonder if this is just down to fitness though.
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Kaiser Zoso
11:50 Thu May 30
Re: Nasri
|
I don’t think he was injured.
There was never any official explanation as to his fitness status.
I think something wasn’t quite right and he couldn’t be bothered.
|
dealcanvey
11:28 Thu May 30
Re: Nasri
|
Need to get rid of all the high earners not pulling their weight. Nasri was one of them.
|
Rossal
9:01 Thu May 30
Re: Nasri
|
He was decent when he played
But he also was injured way to much, on big wages and started taking the piss with his attitude and behavior. Get rid and find the next James Maddison. Lets sign younger hungrier players.
|
Haz
8:21 Thu May 30
Re: Nasri
|
dolph 8:13 Thu May 30
Re: Nasri
Agreed mate. He was also playing up at training, not turning up on time etc. We don't need another sitting around picking up 60 bags a week. A real shame because he showed some real talent on the odd occasion that I saw him.
|
dolph
8:13 Thu May 30
Re: Nasri
|
Beautiful footballer. Cunt of a man.
Oh well.
|
Manuel
8:10 Thu May 30
Re: Nasri
|
Yea pity, as an asset when fit.
I think Sullivan has learnt his lesson with crocks now with Wilshire being the last straw. Probably why we are not in for the likes of Sturridge and Welbeck and other injury prone players that we have been linked to. Cahill another.
|
Cheezey Bell-End
7:59 Thu May 30
Re: Nasri
|
And money I expect. I'm a bit disappointed, but hopefully someone else is lined up.
|
|
|
|
